Tuesday, April 01, 2008

Religious Buffet

Again I'm deviating from the norm by addressing issues relating to Mormonism, but a Mormon friend of mine sent me this quote from a frustrated Protestant, and I thought it would be good to post, along with my response.

For those of you who don't know much about Mormonism, keep in mind one of the main arguments Mormons pose against Protestant Christianity is that we are too fragmented to give a clear and reliable understanding of God.

Here's the quote:

"I don't like all these 'watered down gospels'. It's like a buffet where you can just go and get what you want and walk by the rest. This buffet analogy is a perfect description of the Christian world in general. If you don't like what your church teaches you just walk across the street to a different one and hear what you want to hear. And if you don't want to go on Sunday you can go on Wednesday for an hour. And if you don't want to do that you can just have a fellowship group at your house. And if you don't want to do that you can just read the Bible because the Bible is all you need anyway. And if reading the Bible is still too much for you then you can listen to Christian radio and then just say out loud that you accept Christ and you'll be saved. Isn't it great how easy salvation has gotten over the years?"

My Response:

I sympathize with these comments. I also don't think they're too hard to understand when one considers the nature of contemporary American culture and the nature of Protestantism itself.

The culture at large is defined by consumerism, free market, customer service, fast food, immediate-access entertainment, etc. It's not hard to see how this affects many people's attitudes towards church activity. As the person says, if one doesn't like one thing, then he can go some where else. It's a "market" mentality.

Also, many churches gain attendees by emphasizing the comforting, easy-to-accept aspects of Christianity like the fact that God loves us and has a plan for our lives and has made available our eternal fulfillment in the person of Christ, while obscuring the difficult aspects like our own inherent sinfulness, the call to sacrifice, the division Christ creates in families when some don't follow Him, Jesus' torture and suffering for our sake, and the reality of hell. Probably one of the most prominent examples of a Protestant church (one of the largest in the country) which is all "positive" and rarely, if ever, focuses on the suffering of Christ or the reality of sin, is Lakewood Church in Houston, whose leader/pastor is Joel O'steen. He's also known for writing some best-selling books, Your Best Life Now being one of them. Lakewood is the epitome of a "feel good" church which presents a watered down or fragmented version of the whole Christian message.

Also, this problem is an inherent weakness in Protestantism in general because it is not, like Mormonism and Roman Catholicism (I think this is one of the very few similarities in Mormonism and RC), an authoritarian structure. The problems of the very apparent shallow and uncommitted Christianity referenced in the quote are only possible when people have the freedom to choose how and where they worship. Obviously, if one accepts that the LDS prophet and the priesthood are the authority of God on earth, then one has no choice when that authority says he must go to a certain ward at a certain time, give a certain percentage of his money, etc.

I think the most important thing I can say about those described in the quote you cite is that these are people who aren't really serious to begin with. These are people (I've seen it all my Christian life, and have always been baffled) who go to church for many reasons other than following Christ--because they like the way the music and the atmosphere makes them feel, because they generally believe being in church makes them a good person, or because they think church activity is the best way to instill good morals in their kids. Dietrich Bonhoeffer (a German pastor who opposed the Nazis and was killed by them, and quite a Protestant hero) calls this attitude, among other things, "cheap grace."

I think the same problem exists in Mormonism (and likely most religious groups) but is just less visible because of the authoritarian structure. Leslie had a friend in the ward where she attended in college whose dad told her he really didn't know if he believed that Joseph Smith had a vision and so forth, but he was a member of the LDS Church because he thought it provided a good atmosphere to raise his kids. Another example of this is a Mormon student I taught. I asked him if he was going to go on a mission when he turned 19 and his response was, "Of course. My dad will kick me out of the house if I don't."

In the Protestant perspective, this all amounts to deep frustration with people, but not an insecurity about the foundation of what we believe. Protestants understand ultimate authority to lie not in a priesthood, pope or prophet, or in a church structure, but in the living person of Christ and in what God communicates to us through the Bible. None of this is threatened by the reality of so many people "church shopping" or seeking "cheap grace." If every Protestant church in the country closed its doors because of corrupt leadership or shallow commitment of its members, this would be painfully frustrating, but it would not diminish the power, authority and goodness of the person of Christ, on whom genuine Christians center their lives.


MM

4 Comments:

Blogger Pukrufus said...

I am always impressed with your comments and value your opinion on these matters. One point seems left undone. I agree with you on everything you have said, even about Mormonism. I have seen these weaknesses in fellow members and even myself at times. How would you suggest this problem relates to the Ephesians 4? One of the advantages that I have found in the "authoritarian structure" that you have mentioned is that it satisfies the chaotic dilemma found throughout traditional Christianity while still allowing a person to believe as they wish.

In the Church of Jesus Christ, while accounting for the entire spectrum of faithfulness, or lack thereof, I have found that there is "one body, and one Spirit,... one Lord, one faith, one baptism, one God and Father of all, (v.4-6). Wherever I have attended a ward other than my own (anywhere in the world) I have found a consistency in our faith and understanding of principles of truth. But as you have illustrated inconsistency in the genuineness of the members intentions. This brings me to the actual point of the quote that I sent. Further down in chapter 4 we read that Christ, when he ascended up on high, gave gifts unto men... and gave them apostles, prophets, evangelists, pastors, and teachers (in our interpretation this would suggest a church organization) for the express purpose of helping with the lack of faithfulness... in v.12 we read that he gave them "for the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ: till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ.

So the dilemma that I see with the "religious buffet" is how it measures up to these scriptures in Ephesians. I understand the protestant perspective on authority, organization, the purpose of a church, etc. But I find that wanting compared to the "authoritarian structure" of Mormonism that you speak of.

One quick comment on your 3rd paragraph where you remark that our structure limits "the freedom to choose how and where they worship". As an outsider I can see how it would appear that way. I would suggest that there is more freedom to be found where laws of truth exist, than in a system where anything goes. It is the truth that sets us free, and living according to principles of truth that allows us the freedom to live a life full of joy and contribution. There is a lot more freedom in our system than would appear to an outsider. The policies you speak of are purely for the sake of organization. I would compare them to a trip to McDonalds. We stand in line to order food because we have learned that it will be easier and faster for everyone if we do so... We are free to leave the line at any time but we may never be served. We can't say that McDonalds is inhibiting our freedom to act because they ask us to stay in line. The same goes with policies of the Church. They facilitate a better structure... and when it comes to beliefs and doctrines, I truly am surprised that there is as much consistency as there is. There is NO official commentary on any of our scriptures. We are taught to individually read and understand them and use them as the measuring stick of our belief. You will never find one of our leaders forcing a belief, but rather persuading, by use of the scriptures, to see a principle in the light of truth.

9:23 PM  
Blogger Coach Rockwood said...

I see that you are teacher. So am I. I also use blogger to host my own class websites (Psychology, Sport Psychology, and Spanish). Nice to meet a fellow teacher who actively uses innovative technology to improve student learning.

Anyway, This post of yours felt a little disjointed. (Perhaps you wrote it quickly. I do that often too.)

Most LDS would agree with you about the dangers of "watered down gospels" or "cafeteria Christians." Some scholars have suggested that one of the possible reasons for the LDS Church's rapid growth is the fact that they require so much of their membership. With a lay-clergy (unpaid), all members volunteer their time to run the wards and stakes (the LDS terms for congregations, in case someone reading this is not familiar with LDS vocabulary).

Truth is truth, and must remain unapologetic, regardless of popular opinion. I know you agree with me on this from your other posts.

I'm glad that you recognize the fact that the problem of "cheap grace," merely social conversions, and other similar problems are "likely [found in] most religious groups." As you point out, I don't think it is unique to any one church. Just as Truth is always truth. People are always people, for better and for worse.

I would like to point out an important and unpublicized aspect of the LDS Church's "authoritarian" culture. From the outside looking in, I can see how it could appear like members are offered less freedom from the church leadership (the volunteer lay-clergy, for the most part). In reality, however, from the inside looking in, there is a great emphasis placed on the individual seeking for their own answers. Members are not encouraged to practice "blind faith," but instead to pray for a personal witness of the truth. This goes for the big ideas like accepting Jesus as one's Savior and Redeemer and the truthfulness of the Church, as well as for smaller things like individual counsel and teachings from local church leaders. The members are expected to seek for their own personal witness in all of these matters and everything in between. Therefore, following the counsels of a church leader is not supposed to be blind obedience, but prayerfully considered and choice-driven. In fact, free-will (or "agency," as most LDS call it) is one of the fundamental pieces of Mormon theology.

A father telling his son that he will kick him out of the house if he does not serve a mission represents that one man's "motivation technique" for his own son, not the LDS Church. Similar with the college friend whose father attended church for the positive social climate for raising a family. That anecdote is the experience of one family.

The sole, stated purpose of the LDS Church is the same as most other Christian Churches: to bring people to Christ. Pres. Hinckley, the late president of the Church , was once asked on national TV if he would rather a person who left the LDS Church become a believing Baptist or leave Christianity altogether. His response was a hearty "of course I would rather they be a believing Baptist . . ." (or something like that, I don't recall his exact words) because we want people to come to Christ!

Anyway, I enjoyed your post. And I think we are more on the same page than otherwise. We all need to be wary of the "cafeteria Christian" syndrome!

Christ is the vine and we are the branches (John 15:5). He is the potter and we are the clay (Isaiah 64:8).

"Wherefore, ye must press forward with a steadfastness in Christ, having a perfect brightness of hope, and a love of God and of all men. Wherefore, if ye shall press forward, feasting upon the word of Christ, and endure to the end, behold, thus saith the Father: Ye shall have eternal life. And now, behold, my beloved brethren, this is the way; and there is none other way nor name given under heaven whereby man can be saved in the kingdom of God. And now, behold, this is the doctrine of Christ, and the only and true doctrine of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, which is one God, without end. Amen." (Book of Mormon, 2 Nephi 31: 20-21)

"And we talk of Christ, we rejoice in Christ, we preach of Christ, we prophesy of Christ, and we write according to our prophecies, that our children may know to what source they may look for a remission of their sins." (Book of Mormon, 2 Nephi 25:26)

Thanks for your thoughts. I am enjoying your blog :o)

10:03 PM  
Blogger Coach Rockwood said...

I just reviewed your blog looking for a new post. I noticed a mistake in my last comment. In the 6th paragraph I said that

"Members are not encouraged to practice 'blind faith,' but instead to pray for a personal witness of the truth."

I probably should have said "blind obedience." That phrase better represents the idea I was getting at.

9:00 PM  
Blogger Sallie said...

Wow at your ministry and your faithfulness. You and your family will be in my prayers as you minister to those around you and those that read you! I count it joy to call you my friend!

7:00 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home